Home > Law > DePaul Law Review > Vol. 57 > Iss. 3
Volume 57, Issue 3 Spring 2008: Symposium - Protecting a National Moral Consensus: Challenges in the Application of Atkins v. Virginia
Front Matter
Table of Contents
DePaul College of Law
Atkins v. Virginia: Looking Back and Looking Forward
Shay-Ann Heiser Singh
Articles
Clarence Darrow Keynote Address
Bill Kurtis
Disability Advocacy and Atkins
James W. Ellis
Taking Account of the "Diminished Capacities of the Retarded": Are Capital Jurors up to the Task?
Marla Sandys, Adam Trahan, and Heather Pruss
But He Doesn't Look Retarded: Capital Jury Selection for the Mentally Retarded Client Not Excluded after Atkins v. Virginia
Andrea D. Lyon
Atkins v. Virginia: Lessons from Substance and Procedure in the Constitutional Regulation of Capital Punishment
Carol S. Steiker and Jordan M. Steiker
The Effect of Atkins Below the Mason-Dixon Line
Bryan Stevenson
Notes
Editors
- Editor-in-Chief
- Geoffrey T. Burkhart
- Executive Editor
- Jeremy M. Roe
- Managing Editor of Lead Articles
- Michael Gentithes
- Managing Editor of Notes and Comments
- Catherine Ceko
- Symposium Editor
- Shay-Ann Heiser Singh
- Business Manager
- Patrick F. Ross
- Editor of Articles, Notes, and Comments
- Sarah M. Baum
- Joseph A. Culig
- Mary C. Meixner
- Kathryn B. Richards
- Elliott M. Riebman
- Kimber A. Russell
- Stephanie L. Stalter
- Jonathan H. Urbanek
